🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.